Competition and Adverse Selection in the Small-Dollar Loan Market: Overdraft versus Payday Credit
نویسندگان
چکیده
We find that competition from payday lenders leads depository institutions to raise overdraft fees and reduce the availability of “free” checking accounts. We attribute this rise in prices partly to adverse selection created by banks’ practice of charging a flat fee regardless of the overdraft amount―pricing that favors depositors prone to large overdrafts. Payday credit is priced per dollar borrowed, so when that option is available, depositors prone to small overdrafts switch. That selection works against banks; large overdrafts cost more to supply and, if depositors default, banks lose more, so prices rise. Consistent with this adverse selection hypothesis, we document that the average dollar amount per returned check at banks and other depository institutions increases when depositors have access to payday credit. Our findings illuminate competition and pricing frictions in the large, yet largely unstudied, small-dollar loan market.
منابع مشابه
Competition and Adverse Selection in Consumer Credit Markets:
We investigate the relationship between payday lenders, which offer small, short-term consumer loans, and traditional depository institutions using a national survey on the provision and pricing of checking account services. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that payday loan competition leads to higher prices for overdraft credit and bounced check transactions at traditional depositories. In addit...
متن کاملThe Real Costs of Credit Access: Evidence from the Payday Lending Market∗
Usinggeographicdifferences intheavailabilityof paydayloans, I estimatethe real effects of credit access among low-income households. Payday loans are small, highinterest rate loans that constitutethemarginal sourceof credit formanyhigh risk borrowers. I find no evidence that payday loans alleviate economic hardship. Tothecontrary, loanaccess leads toincreaseddifficultypayingmortgage, rent and u...
متن کاملDefining and Detecting Predatory Lending
We define predatory lending as a welfare-reducing provision of credit. Using a textbook model, we show that lenders profit if they can tempt households into “debt traps,” that is, overborrowing and delinquency. We then test whether payday lending fits our definition of predatory. We find that in states with higher payday loan limits, less educated households and households with uncertain income...
متن کاملMuch Ado About Nothing? Evidence Suggests No Adverse Effects of Payday Lending on Military Members March 27, 2015
We evaluate the effect that payday loan access has on credit and labor market outcomes of individuals in the U.S. Army. Along with the conditional random assignment of servicemembers to different states, we employ three identification strategies using cross-sectional variation in state policies, within-state variation in payday lending laws over time, and difference-indifference analysis using ...
متن کاملRestricting consumer credit access: Household survey evidence on effects around the Oregon rate cap
Many policymakers and some behavioral models hold that restricting access to expensive credit helps consumers by preventing overborrowing. I examine some short-run effects of restricting access, using household panel survey data on payday loan users collected around the imposition of binding restrictions on payday loan terms in Oregon. The results suggest that borrowing fell in Oregon relative ...
متن کامل